| Home | Future Events | Previous Events | People | Articles | Reviews | AboutUs |

The Great Debate: Energy Futures


Energy Futures debate

Held as part of The Great Debate: Development, Sustainability and Environment conference October 2005

The debate over how we should generate our power to best tackle global warming continues to divide opinion. The EU has set a target for renewable energy of 22 per cent by 2010 but moves to build wind farms continue to meet opposition in the UK. Germany is already the world's largest wind power producer but the news that the German parliament has approved plans to double the country’s 15000 turbines over the next 16 years has been met with angry protests.
In May 2004 James Lovelock the noted environmentalist put forward the proposal that if we were really serious about tackling global warming we had no alternative but to embrace nuclear power. So what is the future of power generation and why does this issue so divide opinion?
with

Top of page



Bernard Ingham says:

Sir Bernard Ingham Supporters of Nuclear Energy is a group of individuals who believe that nuclear power is vital to the interests of Britain. At present, we have no energy policy. Instead, we have an environmental policy in which energy policy is subsumed. Current policy envisages meeting growing national electricity requirements through renewables (ie predominantly wind), energy conservation and imported natural gas. Renewables and energy conservation are predictably failing to deliver and increased reliance on natural gas, imported at prices unknown from unstable parts of the world such as Russia, the Middle East, Algeria and Nigeria, is irresponsible. Already natural gas generates 40% of our electricity.

Nuclear is required for reasons of security of supply, national competitiveness and cleanliness - it emits next to no greenhouse gases. After 50 years experience of it in the UK, during which it has generated up to a third of our electricity, it has proved to be reliable and safe. There has not been a single death from a radiation accident over that half century. Moreover, the industry can manage its waste - as it has been doing for 50 years - but could handle it better if the Government summoned up the courage to designate a site for the disposal of the higher and longer radioactive wastes.

Bernard Ingham, Secretary, Supporters of Nuclear Energy.

Top of page



Keith Barnham says:

I am Professor of Physics at Imperial College London. I began my career as an experimental particle physicist at CERN and Berkeley but then changed to researching solar cells when I realised the importance of developing renewable electricity sources and the extent to which they are under-researched. I was a founder member of Scientists for Global Responsibility and its predecessor Scientists Against Nuclear Arms (SANA). As a member of SANA, I led a team that studied the destination of the plutonium produced by the UK civil nuclear programme. The experience gained from this study helped confirm my decision to switch to researching photovoltaic electricity. The plotonium study and the solar cell research have given me insights on the future of the UK electricity supply that I would like to share during the debate.

Keith Barnham, Scientists for Global Responsibility

Top of page



| Home | Future Events | Previous Events | People | Articles | Reviews | AboutUs |

© C J M Hewett, 2005